Friday, February 17, 2017

Christopher Bush’s Dead Man Twice

Dead Man Twice, published in 1930, was one of the very earliest of Christopher Bush’s Ludovic Travers mysteries. Intriguingly in these early books Travers plays second fiddle to a detective named John Franklin.

This book appears to be a sporting mystery but don’t panic. You don’t have to like (or understand) boxing to enjoy this one.

Michael France is a young man generating a lot of excitement. He’s an Englishman who appears to have a real chance of winning the world heavyweight crown. France is a gentleman boxer - a real gentleman, Eton followed by Cambridge, an actual blue-blood. His two inseparable companions are his manager, Kenneth Hayles, and racing driver Peter Claire. The three were childhood friends. Actually the position of Hayles is a little ambiguous - France seems to pretty much manage his own career. Peter Claire has provided the money to finance France’s boxing career. Hayles and France were also co-authors of a book describing France’s career to date whole Hayles is also the writer of a couple of detective stories. These literary endeavours will play a major role in the ensuing mystery (the fact that Claire drives racing cars will also be important). There is also a fourth member of the circle, Claire’s beautiful but flirtatious wife Dorothy.

Everyone is thrilled not only by France’s exploits in the boxing ring but also by his charm and good looks and easy-going confidence. He is something of a national hero. 

John Franklin is employed as a detective by Durangos Limited. We never do find out exactly what the principal business of Durangos is, it just seems to be a large and terribly important company. Durangos also employs a certain Ludovic Travers as a financial advisor.

Franklin is exceptionally pleased when he is given the opportunity to meet Michael France, in fact is invited to dinner where he is mightily impressed by the atmosphere of wealth and good fellowship that seems to surround France. Franklin is therefore shocked when he calls at France’s house a few days later and discovers not one but two corpses!

The formidable Detective Superintendent Wharton of Scotland Yard is assigned to the case. As Franklin is an acquaintance, a detective, a former policeman and a vital witness Wharton is happy to have his help on this case. Wharton is not quite so sure about accepting assistance from Ludovic Travers. He knows and likes Travers but Travers has no experience as a detective.

The case itself is a double murder in two senses although to explain why might risk a spoiler. It is not an impossible crime. Anyone could have committed the murders. Anyone, this is, apart from the only people with any reason for wanting to commit them. Leaving aside the remote possibility of murder by a complete stranger there are a handful of suspects but they have alibis that are absolutely unbreakable.

There’s also a question about the murder method. So what we have are unbreakable alibis, ingenious murder methods, literary clues and also a neat trick with a suicide note - all the things that fans of golden age mysteries love. The plot is quite ambitious but it comes together neatly. I like the fact that there’s an ingenious murder method that actually sounds like it might have worked.

It’s John Franklin and Superintendent Wharton who take centre stage. Travers lurks in the background. At this stage he’s not even an amateur detective. He’s simply an intelligent man who has developed an interest in the subject of crime through is friendships with Franklin and Wharton. He is however a fast learner. A nice touch is that although Wharton doesn’t know it he and Travers are engaged in a race to find the solution - Travers is keen to demonstrate that he really does have the instincts of a detective and if he beats Wharton to the answer then Wharton will have to start thinking of him as a real detective.

Bush would eventually realise that three detectives was one too many and that Wharton and Travers were the characters with the most appeal. Franklin would drop out of the picture. Wharton and Travers were also the ideal team - totally mismatched but for that very reason they’re a formidable combination and their friendship is convincing.

All true golden age detection fans are delighted by mysteries with maps and floor plans. This one has two floor plans and two diagrams!

Even though one would have liked to see more of Ludovic Travers Dead Man Twice is a fine example of the art of the detective story. Highly recommended.


  1. As a boxing-themed mystery, this already sounds appealing on account that nobody died inside a boxing ring. That always seems to happen whenever the genre enters the world of boxing.

    So thanks for the recommendation, D! I really should return to Bush's work one of these days, but he's one of those authors that still requires some work to get a hold of. All of those easily accesible reprints have spoiled me.

    1. I really should return to Bush's work one of these days, but he's one of those authors that still requires some work to get a hold of.

      His work desperately needs to be reprinted. He's better than a lot of the writers who have been reprinted recently.

  2. I am surprised that I was unaware of this author since he wrote so many books. (I actually have one note about a book he wrote set at Christmas, but it did not stick in my memory.) This does sound very interesting and I will have to try to find some of his books.

    1. This does sound very interesting and I will have to try to find some of his books.

      Unfortunately his stuff is not easy to get hold of. It's all out of print and most of his books are either unobtainable or they're horrifically expensive (we're talking hundreds of dollars here). But if you're patient you can find copies of some of them for reasonable prices. I think he's worth the trouble.

  3. I'm working my way through the recent ebook editions of Bush's novels - entirely after reading this blog. I'm kind of disappointed that Franklin will disappear soon - I really like him.

    I loved this story (with one serious reservation). I liked the idea of the 'right murder' and the 'wrong murder'. The method for the 'right' is brilliant - but my favourite was the motive for the 'wrong' murder. The idea of artistic jealousy - given the characters involved - must have gone down a storm with the readership in the 1930s. I'm not sure how many British writers would go for that idea even today!

    But I had real problems with the way the murderers,once identified, were ultimately dealt with - both effectively off-screen. In one case in particular, I do get the feeling that someone who wasn't a gentleman wouldn't be given the option he gets

    But I'd recommend the novels to any mystery fans