The 10th Victim is a 1965 science fiction novel by American writer Robert Sheckley (1928-2005). Bear with me because the story behind the novel is a bit complicated.
In 1953 Sheckley wrote a short story, Seventh Victim, for Galaxy Science Fiction magazine. It was adapted for radio in 1957. The excellent 1965 Italian science fiction movie The 10th Victim was based on Sheckley’s short story. The movie was scripted by Tonino Guerra, Giorgio Salvioni, Ennio Flaiano and Elio Petri and directed by Elio Petri. Sheckley wrote a novelisation of the movie, with the title The 10th Victim, which was published in 1965. Sheckley later wrote two sequels, Victim Prime and Hunter/Victim.
All of these works deal with the theme of murder as sport and entertainment. This became a very popular them in science fiction movies in the 60s, 70s and 80s. Obvious and notable examples are Rollerball and The Running Man.
In this review I will be dealing with both Sheckley’s 1953 short story and his 1965 novelisation.
Sheckley’s short story Seventh Victim is set at some unspecified time in the future. Murder is now entirely legal, but tightly regulated by the government.
This is not quite a post-apocalyptic or a dystopian future although it has some affinities with such futures. War had become so destructive that it was outlawed completely. The government however realised that not only would it be impossible to eliminate the desire for violence, it would also be harmful. To eliminate violence would be to risk eliminating all kinds of socially necessary qualities such as courage and resourcefulness. It would produce a bland conformist society lacking in creativity. And life in such a society would be unsatisfying.
It is important to note that in this story murder is a purely voluntary activity. It is essentially an extreme sport. Both the murderer (the “Hunter”) and the Victim are volunteers. Participants, if they live long enough, alternate between playing the Hunter and Victim roles. A Hunt always ends with a kill but sometimes it is the Victim who is killed and sometimes it’s the Hunter.
Frelaine, the protagonist, has participated in six successful Hunts as both Hunter and Victim. Apart from his enthusiasm for this lethal sport he is a perfectly ordinary well-adjusted citizen. His seventh Hunt as Hunter does not turn out as he expected. To say anything more about the plot would give away spoilers. This is an excellent story with a nice twist and very good very economical world-building - we are told just enough about this future world to get us interested.
Sheckley’s novel The 10th Victim is not just a very expanded version of the short story. It is very much based on the movie, so it’s Sheckley taking his own ideas from his short story and ideas from the writers of the screenplay of the movie. The movie retained all the core ideas of the short story but added a lot of extra touches and some extra characters. The movie changed the names of the two main characters and changed the setting from New York to Rome. The novelisation uses the character names from the movie (Frelaine becomes Marcello Polletti and his adversary in the Hunt becomes Catherine Meredith) and the extra characters from the movie. It is very much a novelisation of the movie, but since the movie was generally faithful to the core idea of the original story the novelisation can be seen as both Sheckley’s creation and the creation of the screenwriters.
In the novel Catherine has completed nine successful Hunts. If she completes her tenth Hunt successfully she becomes a Ten. No-one can compete in more than ten Hunts, but once you become a Ten you gain immense financial, political and social status. For her tenth Hunt she is the Hunter. Marcello is the Victim. This is only his fourth Hunt.
Catherine has a media job so her tenth Hunt is turned into a major media event. As in the short story both the Hunter and the Victim come to have slightly ambivalent feelings about the Hunt since they have both made the mistake of developing some kind of personal connection.
It’s a very witty novel (and that’s true of the film as well). There’s quite a bit of black humour. What’s really interesting is that the novel has no political axe to grind. There is no suggestion whatsoever that this is a totalitarian society. It is neither a purely socialist nor a purely capitalist society. There’s some mockery of big business and the media but there’s mockery of bureaucracy as well. The novel takes no overt stance on the morality of the Hunt. It is not presented as being overtly evil or overtly good. Participation in the Hunts is entirely voluntary. The Hunts do serve a social purpose. Whether that purpose is sufficient to provide a moral justification is left for the reader to decide.
The tone is more absurdist than anything else. The target is not any particular political system but the absurdities of human nature, and of human civilisation. Turning murder into a sport is not a capitalist conspiracy or a socialist conspiracy. It’s just the way people are. We enjoy violence. It satisfies a deep human need. You can create any kind of political utopia but you will never be able to escape from the deep primal needs that drive human behaviour. We want sex, we want love, we want violence, we want money, we want status. We want to dominate and we want to be dominated. We’re an absurd species but it’s our absurdities that make us human.
An excellent amusing eccentric clever novel. Highly recommended.
I’ve reviewed the excellent movie adaptation The 10th Victim (1965) and several of the other movies that deal with the same theme, or variation on the theme, including Joe D’Amato’s Endgame (1983) and Lucio Fulci’s Warriors of the Year 2072 (1984).
No comments:
Post a Comment